Deleted
Joined: May 19, 2024 2:20:43 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 10, 2011 21:51:56 GMT -5
And he resigned, Lak. This clown needs to resign, also. I'm sure Hil will put him to work at World Bank....
|
|
SweetVirginia
Well-Known Member
Joined: Dec 24, 2010 17:56:15 GMT -5
Posts: 1,360
|
Post by SweetVirginia on Jun 10, 2011 22:00:13 GMT -5
The DIFFERENCE, Sweet, is that he was past it, long past it, YEARS past it, when he got nailed for it. Am I wrong? He was not caught in the act. I'm not defending the asshole, just explaining the difference, since people want to compare.. krickitt, Vitter was calling his D.C Hooker to set up sex and diaper appointments while he was on the congressional floor!!!! What he did was illegal and morally wrong. Weiner is a liar, a dog, and he should go, but he should only go after Vitter goes.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: May 19, 2024 2:20:43 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 10, 2011 22:15:39 GMT -5
Sweet-- am I right or wrong that This Vitter azzhole got busted 7 years after he did it, after he and his wife had done whatever weird stuff they had to do to get past it? Right? Wrong? How does anyone go after some stupid politician years later?? Let the voters decide. Old news. This new azzhole is in the act.. as in right now.. why Vitter's name is even being brought up is what I want to know. You like this pe rv-- great, keep him, but Vitter is over and done, was over and done BEFORE he got CAUGHT. Call me weird, but I believe in forgiveness, and repentance. This is VERY fresh with Weiner, and he has shown not a lot of sorrow, and surely does not believe in a higher power that will forgive him. You like him-- great!! I'm glad he is not MY rep. I would be so ashamed. Think of his wife that they use in the Arab world to make them look good....wonder how they greet her now, knowing the Jewish man she married is a dog. This is very bad PR. The Clintons should have known better, for one thing. But NO, it's all about keeping things PC, right?
|
|
SweetVirginia
Well-Known Member
Joined: Dec 24, 2010 17:56:15 GMT -5
Posts: 1,360
|
Post by SweetVirginia on Jun 10, 2011 22:22:53 GMT -5
Sweet-- am I right or wrong that This Vitter azzhole got busted 7 years after he did it, after he and his wife had done whatever weird stuff they had to do to get past it? Right? Wrong? How does anyone go after some stupid politician years later?? Let the voters decide. Old news. This new azzhole is in the act.. as in right now.. why Vitter's name is even being brought up is what I want to know. You like this pe rv-- great, keep him, but Vitter is over and done, was over and done BEFORE he got CAUGHT. Call me weird, but I believe in forgiveness, and repentance. This is VERY fresh with Weiner, and he has shown not a lot of sorrow, and surely does not believe in a higher power that will forgive him. You like him-- great!! I'm glad he is not MY rep. I would be so ashamed. Think of his wife that they use in the Arab world to make them look good....wonder how they greet her now, knowing the Jewish man she married is a dog. This is very bad PR. The Clintons should have known better, for one thing. But NO, it's all about keeping things PC, right? krickitt, are you reading what I am saying?? I think Weiner should go, but not before Vitter goes. Vitter was calling his D.C hooker to set up his sex and diaper appointments, while he was on in the congressional floor, and while he was MARRIED. If Weiner should go (which I think he should for lying and for accusing innocent people of hacking) than so should VITTER for illegally soliciting prostitutes while serving in congress. Dont you?
|
|
cereb
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 23, 2011 0:33:47 GMT -5
Posts: 3,904
|
Post by cereb on Jun 10, 2011 22:23:36 GMT -5
Vitter? Wiener? They both suck out loud and I wouldn't want either one of the dirt bags representing me in any government capacity including town dog catcher.
|
|
SweetVirginia
Well-Known Member
Joined: Dec 24, 2010 17:56:15 GMT -5
Posts: 1,360
|
Post by SweetVirginia on Jun 10, 2011 22:30:21 GMT -5
The DIFFERENCE, Sweet, is that he was past it, long past it, YEARS past it, when he got nailed for it. Am I wrong? He was not caught in the act. I'm not defending the asshole, just explaining the difference, since people want to compare.. krickitt, the fact that it is in the past does not make it better or make it go away. Vitter illegally solicited a prostitute, multiple times, and he admitted to it. Vitter committed this crime while he was a public servant. If he was not "caught in the act" it does not make his crime any less heinous. I am not defending Weiner in any way shape or form, but righties should not have a double standard when it comes to Vitter.
|
|
SweetVirginia
Well-Known Member
Joined: Dec 24, 2010 17:56:15 GMT -5
Posts: 1,360
|
Post by SweetVirginia on Jun 10, 2011 22:33:41 GMT -5
Vitter? Wiener? They both suck out loud and I wouldn't want either one of the dirt bags representing me in any government capacity including town dog catcher. Hi cereb, nice to see you here. I agree they both suck, but I cannot stand the double standard when it comes the the so called "family values" ""conservative" "Christian" Righties who somehow still forgive and support the likes of Vitter who used tax funded income to pay hookers to diaper him and have sex with him while he was married and while he was a public servant.
|
|
|
Post by lakhota on Jun 10, 2011 22:37:07 GMT -5
At least Weiner didn't drag his wife on stage for his Jimmy Swaggart confessional like Vitter did...
|
|
cereb
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 23, 2011 0:33:47 GMT -5
Posts: 3,904
|
Post by cereb on Jun 10, 2011 22:42:22 GMT -5
Vitter? Wiener? They both suck out loud and I wouldn't want either one of the dirt bags representing me in any government capacity including town dog catcher. Hi cereb, nice to see you here. I agree they both suck, but I cannot stand the double standard when it comes the the so called "family values" ""conservative" "Christian" Righties who somehow still forgive and support the likes of Vitter who used tax funded income to pay hookers to diaper him and have sex with him while he was married and while he was a public servant. Hi sweet! Nice to see you too! Yep the who "family values" movement makes me want to puke. Buncha hypocrites. I can pretty much forgive lots of transgressions. But just as an example, if someone stole money from me, I will forgive them for doing so. But, I will still see that charges are pressed, and that they never get near my money again. People who are willing to forgive are very stupid to forget, particularly when it comes to politics.
|
|
cereb
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 23, 2011 0:33:47 GMT -5
Posts: 3,904
|
Post by cereb on Jun 10, 2011 22:43:39 GMT -5
At least Weiner didn't drag his wife on stage for his Jimmy Swaggart confessional like Vitter did... I felt so embarrassed for her. He was a douche bag for even asking her to do that.
|
|
burnsattornincan
Well-Known Member
Joined: Dec 25, 2010 23:05:21 GMT -5
Posts: 1,398
|
Post by burnsattornincan on Jun 10, 2011 23:10:13 GMT -5
Just the icing on the cake, a horrible backdrop with crinkled curtains in a sickly pale red hue.
|
|
henryclay
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 5, 2011 19:03:37 GMT -5
Posts: 3,685
|
Post by henryclay on Jun 11, 2011 0:05:25 GMT -5
Whew!!!
And then there is Bill Clinton, the Oval office and DNA stain on the blue dress, and all the while talking about the use of military forces in the middle east.
Yeah, c'mon guys, we ain't got uhnuf Republicans yit. We orta go find some more so we c'n drag THEM into it too. . . .
Whew!!!
|
|
|
Post by lakhota on Jun 11, 2011 0:13:30 GMT -5
Bill and Monica did a fine job running the country. If only Bush had done half as well.
|
|
SweetVirginia
Well-Known Member
Joined: Dec 24, 2010 17:56:15 GMT -5
Posts: 1,360
|
Post by SweetVirginia on Jun 11, 2011 0:13:45 GMT -5
Whew!!! And then there is Bill Clinton, the Oval office and DNA stain on the blue dress, and all the while talking about the use of military forces in the middle east. Yeah, c'mon guys, let's go find some more Republicans so we can drag THEM into it toot. . . . Whew!!! henry, we are talking about illegal acts. Bill Clinton, getting a BJ in the oval office was not illegal. David Vitter, soliciting the services of a PROSTITUTE, in the state of Louisiana, is an illegal act. Yes, when Clinton lied, it was wrong, but the act of getting a bj in the oval office was not illegal. It was a dirt bag, heinous act for sure. Im not excusing Clinton or Weiner, but you should not excuse Vitter, or Craig or Ensign, or any of the other "family values" right winged public servants.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: May 19, 2024 2:20:43 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 11, 2011 0:14:38 GMT -5
You tell 'em, Henry!!!
|
|
henryclay
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 5, 2011 19:03:37 GMT -5
Posts: 3,685
|
Post by henryclay on Jun 11, 2011 0:30:18 GMT -5
Hey girls, we're all grown-ups here aren't we? I'm not accusing anybody of anything. What I AM doing is trying to keep track of the different shades of gray you folks keep finding for your boys to hide behind.
|
|
|
Post by lakhota on Jun 11, 2011 0:31:35 GMT -5
"This is why Twitter exists. Members of Congress can now send you pictures of their penises electronically. Remember the old days of Senator Larry Craig when you had to get in your car, drive to the airport, find the airport bathroom, try to figure out which stall he's in, knock on the door...Now they send it right to your house." —Jay Leno More Weiner Jokes: politicalhumor.about.com/b/2011/06/07/anthony-weiner-jokes.htm
|
|
NoMoreLunacy
Well-Known Member
Joined: Jun 8, 2011 23:21:57 GMT -5
Posts: 1,293
|
Post by NoMoreLunacy on Jun 11, 2011 0:31:42 GMT -5
Weiner should resign because Clinton got his dick sucked. Someone has to pay, sometime. Otherwise it will be always the Republicans getting into trouble over ethics issues. I am sick and tired of that.
|
|
zipity
Well-Known Member
Joined: Dec 21, 2010 0:32:17 GMT -5
Posts: 1,101
|
Post by zipity on Jun 11, 2011 1:00:11 GMT -5
The damage to Breitbart's reputation was intentional. It was not incidental due to some 'factual error'. Jeeze.
I guess when Breitbart sues him for slander and the court finds for Breitbart we'll know you were right. If Breitbart doesn't sue him then we'll know that Breitbart doesn't believe his reputation was harmed or he knows that he can't prove that Weiner was trying to do damage to Breitbart's reputation and not just trying to lie his way out of a bad situation.
|
|
|
Post by lakhota on Jun 13, 2011 21:38:27 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by ed1066 on Jun 14, 2011 14:26:19 GMT -5
I see Lakhota and Sweet are still pushing their Vitter-cart through the streets of Weinerville looking for a few customers...
|
|