Are criminal lawyers needed....

[kadee79]

For a constitutional violation of "high crimes & misdemeanor"?

After weeks of dismissing the impeachment inquiry as a hollow partisan attack, President Trump and his closest advisers now recognize that the snowballing probe poses a serious threat to the president — and that they have little power to block it, according to multiple aides and advisers. 

The dawning realization comes as Democrats rapidly gather evidence from witness after witness testifying about the pressure put on Ukraine to investigate Trump’s political rivals. The president is increasingly frustrated that his efforts to stop people from cooperating with the probe have so far collapsed under the weight of legally powerful congressional subpoenas, advisers said.


The Democratic strategy got a boost Friday from a federal judge, who ruled that the House impeachment inquiry is legal. In the coming week, House investigators are scheduled to hear testimony from five more witnesses, including on Saturday from an acting assistant secretary of state for Europe, who is expected to testify about the efforts to oust the previous U.S. ambassador.

In a sign of the growing realization of his potential jeopardy, Trump has brought back Jane and Marty Raskin, criminal defense attorneys who were part of his legal team during the Mueller investigation, to help him navigate the impeachment inquiry, along with his attorney Jay Sekulow and White House lawyers. Their return is a late acknowledgment, some White House advisers say, that the facts coming out are bad for the president and that both his White House and personal attorneys need to try to get in front of what else may emerge.

www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-frustrated-as-white-house-effort-to-defy-impeachment-inquiry-fails-to-halt-witness-testimony-advisers-say/ar-AAJmZl7?li=BBnb7Kz 

[Tennesseer]

Oct 26, 2019 11:40:09 GMT -5 kadee79 said:

For a constitutional violation of "high crimes & misdemeanor"?

After weeks of dismissing the impeachment inquiry as a hollow partisan attack, President Trump and his closest advisers now recognize that the snowballing probe poses a serious threat to the president — and that they have little power to block it, according to multiple aides and advisers. 

The dawning realization comes as Democrats rapidly gather evidence from witness after witness testifying about the pressure put on Ukraine to investigate Trump’s political rivals. The president is increasingly frustrated that his efforts to stop people from cooperating with the probe have so far collapsed under the weight of legally powerful congressional subpoenas, advisers said.


The Democratic strategy got a boost Friday from a federal judge, who ruled that the House impeachment inquiry is legal. In the coming week, House investigators are scheduled to hear testimony from five more witnesses, including on Saturday from an acting assistant secretary of state for Europe, who is expected to testify about the efforts to oust the previous U.S. ambassador.

In a sign of the growing realization of his potential jeopardy, Trump has brought back Jane and Marty Raskin, criminal defense attorneys who were part of his legal team during the Mueller investigation, to help him navigate the impeachment inquiry, along with his attorney Jay Sekulow and White House lawyers. Their return is a late acknowledgment, some White House advisers say, that the facts coming out are bad for the president and that both his White House and personal attorneys need to try to get in front of what else may emerge.

www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-frustrated-as-white-house-effort-to-defy-impeachment-inquiry-fails-to-halt-witness-testimony-advisers-say/ar-AAJmZl7?li=BBnb7Kz 

'

When trump has Rudy Giuliani as his personal attorney, what more does he need?

[kadee79]

 

Oct 26, 2019 12:26:00 GMT -5 Tennesseer said:

Oct 26, 2019 11:40:09 GMT -5 kadee79 said:

'

When trump has Rudy Giuliani as his personal attorney, what more does he need?

What more does he need?

LOTS OF HELP!!!