swamp
Community Leader
Don't be a fool. Call me!
Joined: Dec 19, 2010 16:03:22 GMT -5
Posts: 45,309
|
Post by swamp on Apr 9, 2019 12:58:11 GMT -5
|
|
happyhoix
Distinguished Associate
Joined: Oct 7, 2011 7:22:42 GMT -5
Posts: 20,880
|
Post by happyhoix on Apr 9, 2019 13:04:50 GMT -5
What is it with Nunes being sue happy lately? First the Nunes cow, now this. I thought Republicans were against frivolous lawsuits. |
|
OldCoyote
Senior Associate
Joined: Dec 21, 2010 10:34:48 GMT -5
Posts: 13,449
|
Post by OldCoyote on Apr 9, 2019 13:13:13 GMT -5
Annnnd, if he wins these lawsuits?
|
|
swamp
Community Leader
Don't be a fool. Call me!
Joined: Dec 19, 2010 16:03:22 GMT -5
Posts: 45,309
|
Post by swamp on Apr 9, 2019 13:15:19 GMT -5
I don't think he will. He wasn't slandered.
He is part owner of the winery. It was sued. It is unclear if he was aware of the activities. Nothing about it is untrue or malicious.
It's baseless.
|
|
oped
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 20, 2018 20:49:12 GMT -5
Posts: 4,676
|
Post by oped on Apr 9, 2019 13:23:00 GMT -5
I loved when DevinCow became a thing, but i have to say i think #YachtCocaineProstitutes is pretty fun too...
|
|
Deleted
Joined: Apr 25, 2024 15:11:14 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 9, 2019 13:28:32 GMT -5
What is it with Nunes being sue happy lately? First the Nunes cow, now this. I thought Republicans were against frivolous lawsuits. Republicans are only against frivolous lawsuits when they are filed against them. Democrats are only against frivolous lawsuits when they are filed against them. I thought everyone understood the political double standard. Every one is a snowflake, if that's the standard for snowflakes. Doesn't anyone read the threads in politics anymore.  |
|
Deleted
Joined: Apr 25, 2024 15:11:14 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 9, 2019 13:34:32 GMT -5
I don't think he will. He wasn't slandered. He is part owner of the winery. It was sued. It is unclear if he was aware of the activities. Nothing about it is untrue or malicious. It's baseless. But it made the print media. And most will only remember the headline, or something close, in a later telling. Devin Nunes sues newspaper company, alleging ‘character assassination’
Mission accomplished. |
|
swamp
Community Leader
Don't be a fool. Call me!
Joined: Dec 19, 2010 16:03:22 GMT -5
Posts: 45,309
|
Post by swamp on Apr 9, 2019 13:39:06 GMT -5
I loved when DevinCow became a thing, but i have to say i think #YachtCocaineProstitutes is pretty fun too... TBH, a yacht, cocaine, and prostitutes sounds like a great time. |
|
swamp
Community Leader
Don't be a fool. Call me!
Joined: Dec 19, 2010 16:03:22 GMT -5
Posts: 45,309
|
Post by swamp on Apr 9, 2019 13:39:56 GMT -5
I don't think he will. He wasn't slandered. He is part owner of the winery. It was sued. It is unclear if he was aware of the activities. Nothing about it is untrue or malicious. It's baseless. But it made the print media. And most will only remember the headline, or something close, in a later telling. Devin Nunes sues newspaper company, alleging ‘character assassination’
Mission accomplished. what mission? That he looks like a pansy? Coupled with his issues with Twitter, and now this, he really needs to get a thicker skin. |
|
oped
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 20, 2018 20:49:12 GMT -5
Posts: 4,676
|
Post by oped on Apr 9, 2019 13:39:59 GMT -5
Yeah. Last time he took a parody twitter account at 1200 followers and made it trend... growing it to 630k+ followers.... Devin Cow is all anyone remembers of that first filing...
This time he gets #YauchtCocaineProstitutes... THAT is what people will remember.
He hopes to dissuade criticism with lawsuits... and he does not learn...
|
|
Deleted
Joined: Apr 25, 2024 15:11:14 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 9, 2019 13:42:28 GMT -5
But it made the print media. And most will only remember the headline, or something close, in a later telling. Devin Nunes sues newspaper company, alleging ‘character assassination’
Mission accomplished. Coupled with his issues with Twitter, and now this, he really needs to get a thicker skin. His name in a headline. He's somebody. All the details in the story will be forgotten by 99% of the readers, by next week. I'm not counting the seven regular political posters, over here on YMAM. We remember details ad nauseam. |
|
oped
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 20, 2018 20:49:12 GMT -5
Posts: 4,676
|
Post by oped on Apr 9, 2019 13:45:44 GMT -5
By the way... why those words are trending... is in part at least because in this newest filing his lawyer suggests that Mays emphasized the words woman, Devin and cocaine in her tweets... because they are bolded... apparently not understanding that they were bolded because the idiot of a lawyer keyword searched those words which made them highlighted in the text. He is by far the stupidest attorney available... but then i'm guessing no one else would touch this shit with a long pole....
|
|
oped
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 20, 2018 20:49:12 GMT -5
Posts: 4,676
|
Post by oped on Apr 9, 2019 13:46:30 GMT -5
Over 600,000 active followers on DevinCow... 200,000 more than follow Devin himself...
|
|
happyhoix
Distinguished Associate
Joined: Oct 7, 2011 7:22:42 GMT -5
Posts: 20,880
|
Post by happyhoix on Apr 9, 2019 13:57:01 GMT -5
By the way... why those words are trending... is in part at least because in this newest filing his lawyer suggests that Mays emphasized the words woman, Devin and cocaine in her tweets... because they are bolded... apparently not understanding that they were bolded because the idiot of a lawyer keyword searched those words which made them highlighted in the text. He is by far the stupidest attorney available... but then i'm guessing no one else would touch this shit with a long pole....  |
|
swamp
Community Leader
Don't be a fool. Call me!
Joined: Dec 19, 2010 16:03:22 GMT -5
Posts: 45,309
|
Post by swamp on Apr 9, 2019 14:25:44 GMT -5
what mission? That he looks like a pansy? Coupled with his issues with Twitter, and now this, he really needs to get a thicker skin. His name in a headline. He's somebody. All the details in the story will be forgotten by 99% of the readers, by next week. I'm not counting the seven regular political posters, over here on YMAM. We remember details ad nauseam. he's somebody, alright. |
|
swamp
Community Leader
Don't be a fool. Call me!
Joined: Dec 19, 2010 16:03:22 GMT -5
Posts: 45,309
|
Post by swamp on Apr 9, 2019 14:28:10 GMT -5
By the way... why those words are trending... is in part at least because in this newest filing his lawyer suggests that Mays emphasized the words woman, Devin and cocaine in her tweets... because they are bolded... apparently not understanding that they were bolded because the idiot of a lawyer keyword searched those words which made them highlighted in the text. He is by far the stupidest attorney available... but then i'm guessing no one else would touch this shit with a long pole.... he needs a 14 year old in his office to teach him how twitter works. |
|
kadee79
Senior Associate
S.W. Ga., zone 8b, out in the boonies!
Joined: Mar 30, 2011 15:12:55 GMT -5
Posts: 10,801 
|
Post by kadee79 on Apr 9, 2019 15:00:50 GMT -5
what mission? That he looks like a pansy? Coupled with his issues with Twitter, and now this, he really needs to get a thicker skin. His name in a headline. He's somebody. All the details in the story will be forgotten by 99% of the readers, by next week. I'm not counting the seven regular political posters, over here on YMAM. We remember details ad nauseam. Yep, his name in the headlines...again...showing just how stupid he really is. Guess that goes with being such a DT trooper!  |
|
djAdvocate
Member Emeritus
only posting when the mood strikes me.
Joined: Jun 21, 2011 12:33:54 GMT -5
Posts: 75,077 
Mini-Profile Background: {"image":"","color":"000307"}
|
Post by djAdvocate on Apr 9, 2019 23:07:58 GMT -5
I don't think he will. He wasn't slandered. He is part owner of the winery. It was sued. It is unclear if he was aware of the activities. Nothing about it is untrue or malicious. It's baseless. #benghazi (repeat 9x)
|
|
Deleted
Joined: Apr 25, 2024 15:11:14 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 10, 2019 8:24:40 GMT -5
His name in a headline. He's somebody. All the details in the story will be forgotten by 99% of the readers, by next week. I'm not counting the seven regular political posters, over here on YMAM. We remember details ad nauseam. he's somebody, alright. I actual don't know anything about him. The only attorney that I heard about in the news recently was the one representing stormy daniels. I think it was for blackmail on a case not related to hers. |
|
Deleted
Joined: Apr 25, 2024 15:11:14 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 10, 2019 8:30:47 GMT -5
His name in a headline. He's somebody. All the details in the story will be forgotten by 99% of the readers, by next week. I'm not counting the seven regular political posters, over here on YMAM. We remember details ad nauseam. Yep, his name in the headlines...again...showing just how stupid he really is. Guess that goes with being such a DT trooper! Yes, it's Trumps fault for everything negative. I have eight stitches in my left shin from a laceration. I stupidly struck it on a small stub sticking up from a bush I cut down last year. Yep, Trumps fault, I was thinking about one of his tweets. |
|
Deleted
Joined: Apr 25, 2024 15:11:14 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 10, 2019 8:32:31 GMT -5
I don't think he will. He wasn't slandered. He is part owner of the winery. It was sued. It is unclear if he was aware of the activities. Nothing about it is untrue or malicious. It's baseless. #benghazi (repeat 9x)
I'm so tired of next to baseless investigations. |
|
tallguy
Senior Associate
Joined: Apr 2, 2011 19:21:59 GMT -5
Posts: 14,147
|
Post by tallguy on Apr 10, 2019 10:19:46 GMT -5
I'm so tired of next to baseless investigations. Baseless investigations don't end up with dozens of indictments and several guilty pleas. Baseless investigations are a far-right Republican specialty. Party and power over country is a bad combination. Voters need to be better to be able to see through it. |
|
Deleted
Joined: Apr 25, 2024 15:11:14 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 10, 2019 11:51:31 GMT -5
I'm so tired of next to baseless investigations. Baseless investigations don't end up with dozens of indictments and several guilty pleas. Baseless investigations are a far-right Republican specialty. Party and power over country is a bad combination. Voters need to be better to be able to see through it. Any for direct Russian collusion, per the Mueller directive ? Quote; The Special Counsel’s investigation did not find that the Trump campaign or anyone associated with it conspired or coordinated with Russia in its efforts to influence the 2016 US presidential election.www.wired.com/story/mueller-says-no-collusion-trump-russia-investigation/Like Benghazi and many others, next to baseless. |
|
kadee79
Senior Associate
S.W. Ga., zone 8b, out in the boonies!
Joined: Mar 30, 2011 15:12:55 GMT -5
Posts: 10,801
|
Post by kadee79 on Apr 10, 2019 12:16:58 GMT -5
Baseless investigations don't end up with dozens of indictments and several guilty pleas. Baseless investigations are a far-right Republican specialty. Party and power over country is a bad combination. Voters need to be better to be able to see through it. Any for direct Russian collusion, per the Mueller directive ? Quote; The Special Counsel’s investigation did not find that the Trump campaign or anyone associated with it conspired or coordinated with Russia in its efforts to influence the 2016 US presidential election.www.wired.com/story/mueller-says-no-collusion-trump-russia-investigation/Like Benghazi and many others, next to baseless. Uummm, so far we don't know EXACTLY what Mueller's report says....so until we do....no one knows whether or not there was collusion...whether or not it is/was a criminal act or anything else. |
|
Deleted
Joined: Apr 25, 2024 15:11:14 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 10, 2019 12:19:21 GMT -5
Any for direct Russian collusion, per the Mueller directive ? Quote; The Special Counsel’s investigation did not find that the Trump campaign or anyone associated with it conspired or coordinated with Russia in its efforts to influence the 2016 US presidential election.www.wired.com/story/mueller-says-no-collusion-trump-russia-investigation/Like Benghazi and many others, next to baseless. Uummm, so far we don't know EXACTLY what Mueller's report says....so until we do....no one knows whether or not there was collusion...whether or not it is/was a criminal act or anything else. Maybe we need an investigation of the investigation, as to why the story isn't being made 100% public ? SDNY can handle it.  |
|
happyhoix
Distinguished Associate
Joined: Oct 7, 2011 7:22:42 GMT -5
Posts: 20,880
|
Post by happyhoix on Apr 10, 2019 13:22:05 GMT -5
Baseless investigations don't end up with dozens of indictments and several guilty pleas. Baseless investigations are a far-right Republican specialty. Party and power over country is a bad combination. Voters need to be better to be able to see through it. Any for direct Russian collusion, per the Mueller directive ? Quote; The Special Counsel’s investigation did not find that the Trump campaign or anyone associated with it conspired or coordinated with Russia in its efforts to influence the 2016 US presidential election.www.wired.com/story/mueller-says-no-collusion-trump-russia-investigation/Like Benghazi and many others, next to baseless. What did Barr's letter say about obstruction? Think carefully. Maybe go back and actually read it.
|
|
OldCoyote
Senior Associate
Joined: Dec 21, 2010 10:34:48 GMT -5
Posts: 13,449
|
Post by OldCoyote on Apr 10, 2019 16:55:01 GMT -5
Any for direct Russian collusion, per the Mueller directive ? Quote; The Special Counsel’s investigation did not find that the Trump campaign or anyone associated with it conspired or coordinated with Russia in its efforts to influence the 2016 US presidential election.www.wired.com/story/mueller-says-no-collusion-trump-russia-investigation/Like Benghazi and many others, next to baseless. Uummm, so far we don't know EXACTLY what Mueller's report says....so until we do....no one knows whether or not there was collusion...whether or not it is/was a criminal act or anything else. Of course we know, if there was anything there they the so called insiders would be screaming from the highest hills,,
But nothing and that says it all!
|
|
OldCoyote
Senior Associate
Joined: Dec 21, 2010 10:34:48 GMT -5
Posts: 13,449
|
Post by OldCoyote on Apr 10, 2019 16:57:27 GMT -5
Any for direct Russian collusion, per the Mueller directive ? Quote; The Special Counsel’s investigation did not find that the Trump campaign or anyone associated with it conspired or coordinated with Russia in its efforts to influence the 2016 US presidential election.www.wired.com/story/mueller-says-no-collusion-trump-russia-investigation/Like Benghazi and many others, next to baseless. What did Barr's letter say about obstruction? Think carefully. Maybe go back and actually read it.
Ahhhh yes obstruction,,, notice that nothing else has been said about it,, Hmmmm, wonder why?? Like maybe there is nothing there?
|
|
tallguy
Senior Associate
Joined: Apr 2, 2011 19:21:59 GMT -5
Posts: 14,147
|
Post by tallguy on Apr 10, 2019 16:58:26 GMT -5
The only people who DO know anything have come out publicly that the "summary" by Barr does not tell the true story about the report they compiled, and that it is worse for the president than his hand-picked toady reported.
What the rest of us know is that you are once again spouting nonsense about something you know nothing about. I wish that could be a surprise, but it's not.
|
|
djAdvocate
Member Emeritus
only posting when the mood strikes me.
Joined: Jun 21, 2011 12:33:54 GMT -5
Posts: 75,077
Mini-Profile Background: {"image":"","color":"000307"}
|
Post by djAdvocate on Apr 10, 2019 17:35:33 GMT -5
Baseless investigations don't end up with dozens of indictments and several guilty pleas. Baseless investigations are a far-right Republican specialty. Party and power over country is a bad combination. Voters need to be better to be able to see through it. Any for direct Russian collusion, per the Mueller directive ? indictments? plenty. |
|
