Rush says media treating Dzhokhar like Trayvon

[AgeOfEnlightenmentSCP]

Apr 30, 2013 17:22:07 GMT -5 Tennesseer said:

Apr 30, 2013 17:19:34 GMT -5 frankq said:

He is....And the best part is, the stroke goes on talking about working class people and such ... and he makes 500K a week!

In death, that 500k will be worthless.

We'll all be dead at some point.  What is your point?

[AgeOfEnlightenmentSCP]

Gosnell barely made headlines until Kirsten Powers, a columnist for USA Today and a left-leaning political analyst for Fox News, wrote a column shaming the media into finally acknowledging the grizzly case.

The media’s modus operandi is completely political. Long ago, the press picked its side in the abortion debate.

They bought into the abortion industry’s “safe, rare, and legal” propaganda. So they ignored stories about unsafe abortion clinics, botched procedures, and subsequent fatalities. These topics were a protected from discussion in the press.

Since Powers spotlighted the case a few honest journalists have admitted that their political bias resulted in their failure to acknowledge the Gosnell trial. The Washington Post’s Melinda Henneberger wrote, “I say we didn’t write more because the only abortion story most outlets ever cover in the news pages is every single threat or perceived threat to abortion rights.”

On air, HuffPost Live host Marc Lamont Hill admitted, “For what it’s worth, I do think that those of us on the left have made a decision not to cover this trial because we worry that it’ll compromise abortion rights.”

The fact that members of the media purposefully ignored this corruption not only makes them an accomplice to the Gosnell infanticides and murder, but it also makes then an accessory to every wrongful death in every abortion clinic with unsafe health and safety standards.


Read more: www.foxnews.com/opinion/2013/04/29/gosnell-had-accomplice-in-murders-liberal-media/#ixzz2S3ImQY5E

[djAdvocate]

May 1, 2013 9:36:56 GMT -5 AgeOfEnlightenmentSCP said:

Apr 30, 2013 14:52:09 GMT -5 djAdvocate said:

And liberals freely admit the coverage of Gosnell is being avoided and downplayed because it'll hurt the far left radical taxpayer funded abortion on demand agenda.

can you substantiate that?

I already did.  Numerous times.  Go read the media blackout of Gosnell trial thread.

you established a portion of it.  what i was asking for is that this is a RESULT of the "far left radical taxpayer funded abortion on demand agenda".

have anything to show for that?

[djAdvocate]

May 1, 2013 9:44:46 GMT -5 AgeOfEnlightenmentSCP said:

Gosnell barely made headlines until Kirsten Powers, a columnist for USA Today and a left-leaning political analyst for Fox News, wrote a column shaming the media into finally acknowledging the grizzly case.

i see.  so two liberals broke this, and yet there is a liberal blackout.  got it.

[Tennesseer]

May 1, 2013 9:40:57 GMT -5 AgeOfEnlightenmentSCP said:

Apr 30, 2013 17:22:07 GMT -5 Tennesseer said:

In death, that 500k will be worthless.

We'll all be dead at some point.  What is your point?

Money is worthless to the dead.

[AgeOfEnlightenmentSCP]

May 1, 2013 11:55:09 GMT -5 djAdvocate said:

May 1, 2013 9:44:46 GMT -5 AgeOfEnlightenmentSCP said:

i see.  so two liberals broke this, and yet there is a liberal blackout.  got it.

No.  Two liberals broke the silence about the media blackout and shamed the media into covering this story.  You miss the point a lot, dj.  You're not stupid, so I have to assume this is a tactic.  Well, dj- I'm not stupid, either.

[AgeOfEnlightenmentSCP]

May 1, 2013 12:54:57 GMT -5 Tennesseer said:

May 1, 2013 9:40:57 GMT -5 AgeOfEnlightenmentSCP said:

We'll all be dead at some point.  What is your point?

Money is worthless to the dead.

Yeah, and being broke dick sucks for the living.  No point at all, I see.

[AgeOfEnlightenmentSCP]

Before the real media- the conservative truth-seeking media- got onto the Trayvon Martin case, TM was described as "an unarmed black teenager" innocently walking home from the 7-11 with his iced tea and candy and this was his picture:


Later, the story was corrected and we found out about a different Trayvon Martin:

[djAdvocate]

May 1, 2013 13:29:34 GMT -5 AgeOfEnlightenmentSCP said:

May 1, 2013 11:55:09 GMT -5 djAdvocate said:

i see.  so two liberals broke this, and yet there is a liberal blackout.  got it.

No.  Two liberals broke the silence about the media blackout and shamed the media into covering this story.  You miss the point a lot, dj. 

i didn't miss the point, i just disagree with the "shaming" part.  the media is utterly shameless, imo.  shame sells no hot dogs.

You're not stupid, so I have to assume this is a tactic.  Well, dj- I'm not stupid, either.

i never accused you or anyone else here of being stupid, Paul.  in fact, i have praised the members of this board for being smarter than me, regularly.

[AgeOfEnlightenmentSCP]

The original pic of George Zimmerman widely distributed was this one (he was even described as a "white hispanic" by one liberal news outlet in a desperate attempt to make it a white-on-black crime-- because again, it's not about the truth to these people, it's about politics. No matter what the issue:



The fringe left media then went to extreme lengths to hide these pics- and btw, the politically-motivated prosecutor excluded the medical evidence of injuries to Zimmerman, and injuries to Trayvon's hands and knuckles from pummeling Zimmerman:




If the media isn't dragged kicking and screaming to the truth, and sometimes even when they are- they ignore the truth if the truth conflicts with their twisted fringe left worldview.

[AgeOfEnlightenmentSCP]

The Boston Marathon Bomber is described in reports as a "19 year old college student".  It's rare to find any description of the bombers anywhere as radical islamic terrorists.  When you do, it's not a mainstream report.  

[Opti]

May 1, 2013 14:26:38 GMT -5 AgeOfEnlightenmentSCP said:

The Boston Marathon Bomber is described in reports as a "19 year old college student".  It's rare to find any description of the bombers anywhere as radical islamic terrorists.  When you do, it's not a mainstream report.  

Probably for the novel reason the 19 year old college student thing is a fact and the radical islamic terrorist part isn't really proven. Yes they are Muslims and yes brother #2 did a terrorist act. The question is really why. This why luckily the Aurora killer wasn't called a Christian terrorist, a Radical Islamic terrorist, etc. The public still does not know why he did it. Intention is everything if you are going to bill someone as a terrorist. We actually have slightly more reason to bill brother #1 as a terrorist, but again, a label is not going to solve anything. They do call him the Boston Bomber sometimes but I guess since it doesn't have Muslim or Islam in the label it isn't good enough for some?


I don't need him to be labeled a radical islamic terrorist.
The important thing happened - he was caught.
The next important thing is the trial.
Calling him the President of the Howdy Doody Supper Club(thanks Mad Men)
or the most scary radical islamic terrorist ever is pretty useless and petty at this point.

[Opti]

May 1, 2013 13:29:34 GMT -5 AgeOfEnlightenmentSCP said:

May 1, 2013 11:55:09 GMT -5 djAdvocate said:

i see.  so two liberals broke this, and yet there is a liberal blackout.  got it.

No.  Two liberals broke the silence about the media blackout and shamed the media into covering this story.  You miss the point a lot, dj.  You're not stupid, so I have to assume this is a tactic.  Well, dj- I'm not stupid, either.

Perhaps you can explain why Fox, part of the media, and Rush, part of the media didn't
shame the media into covering it either?

[AgeOfEnlightenmentSCP]

May 1, 2013 15:02:37 GMT -5 Opti said:

May 1, 2013 13:29:34 GMT -5 AgeOfEnlightenmentSCP said:

No.  Two liberals broke the silence about the media blackout and shamed the media into covering this story.  You miss the point a lot, dj.  You're not stupid, so I have to assume this is a tactic.  Well, dj- I'm not stupid, either.

Perhaps you can explain why Fox, part of the media, and Rush, part of the media didn't
shame the media into covering it either?

They did.  In fact, Fox ran a full one hour special.

[AgeOfEnlightenmentSCP]

radical islamic terrorist part isn't really proven.

[AgeOfEnlightenmentSCP]

May 1, 2013 14:58:59 GMT -5 Opti said:

May 1, 2013 14:26:38 GMT -5 AgeOfEnlightenmentSCP said:

The Boston Marathon Bomber is described in reports as a "19 year old college student".  It's rare to find any description of the bombers anywhere as radical islamic terrorists.  When you do, it's not a mainstream report.  

Probably for the novel reason the 19 year old college student thing is a fact and the radical islamic terrorist part isn't really proven. Yes they are Muslims and yes brother #2 did a terrorist act. The question is really why. This why luckily the Aurora killer wasn't called a Christian terrorist, a Radical Islamic terrorist, etc. The public still does not know why he did it. Intention is everything if you are going to bill someone as a terrorist. We actually have slightly more reason to bill brother #1 as a terrorist, but again, a label is not going to solve anything. They do call him the Boston Bomber sometimes but I guess since it doesn't have Muslim or Islam in the label it isn't good enough for some?


I don't need him to be labeled a radical islamic terrorist.
The important thing happened - he was caught.
The next important thing is the trial.
Calling him the President of the Howdy Doody Supper Club(thanks Mad Men)
or the most scary radical islamic terrorist ever is pretty useless and petty at this point.

Since when in the history of journalism is the "why" unimportant?

[Tennesseer]

May 1, 2013 13:43:36 GMT -5 AgeOfEnlightenmentSCP said:

Before the real media- the conservative truth-seeking media- got onto the Trayvon Martin case, TM was described as "an unarmed black teenager" innocently walking home from the 7-11 with his iced tea and candy and this was his picture:


Later, the story was corrected and we found out about a different Trayvon Martin:

You can get all outraged as you want Paul with the pictures, but at the end of the day, Trayvon Martin was ""an unarmed black teenager" innocently walking home from the 7-11 with his iced tea and candy.".

[cereb]

Apr 30, 2013 19:38:15 GMT -5 @steve said:

Apr 30, 2013 18:05:09 GMT -5 cereb said:

Ah.
But the subject wasn't "liberal pundits", it was Rush. The big fat hypocrite drug abusing ex wife collecting shit twisting lying sack of steaming dung law breaking entitled rich bastard overpaid over rated brainless douche bag.

Worship him if you must, but most people I know who do listen to him only do so to hear what incredibly moronic item with come out of his mouth next. He'll be touched that his fans really "care" about him, but as long as his checks cash he'll keep on saying any dumb shit his fan base are willing to listen to.

I havent listened to Rush in probably 15 years.  The last time I did listen to him was because I had a boss who listened to him.  Sometimes I would turn on the generator just to drown Rush out.  I am no Rush fan.  I dont have a problem with your opinion of him, I have a problem with a community forum I like, being full of shit.  Not full of shit, like, "he's full of himself" type shit, but excrement type shit, just gross excrement trying to be passed as anything but shit.


I find you 'STFU', douche bag, whatever you said above comments  to be  stupid, offensive and even though moderators here wont say so, against the COC  of this forum.  There is nothing intelligent about it.  It almost certainly drives out good content.   It is like taking a book you dont like and wiping your shit on it.  Sure it makes a comment, but it is still shit. That is what I think of your comment abut Rush being a douche bag.  It is not a single comment, but  a context of shit smearing comments. Your STFU if you disagree with me statement from the other day, included.  My opinion for what its worth.

Aw isn't that cute! You are probably a little old for me Steve, and judging by the amount of time and energy you are spending on what I have to say about any given thing I think it's only fair to tell you up front that you probably don't make enough money to keep me in shoes nor am I into having your babies.

[TonyTiger]

So, have we figured out yet, whether there's any truth to Rush's accusation that the Liberal-dominated Lamestream Media have been treating the Chechen Turd the same way they treated Saint Trayvon (patron saint of Skittles and pointless and purposeless Home Boys) while his cannonization was still underway?     

[cereb]

May 1, 2013 18:05:22 GMT -5 @steve said:

Look at the  post directly above yours please.

And let me add that you also take yourself entirely too seriously for my taste.


ETA, the good peeps of this forum really aren't interested in any continuation of our discussion. I highly recommend the ignore feature should you find my postings so offensive or at the very least, don't put so much obvious effort into finding them, commenting to your displeasure and having them deleted. Just a bit of friendly advice. I'm here to help!

[swamp]

So every teen who has their picture taking flipping the bird is a murderous thug?  

[TonyTiger]

May 1, 2013 18:17:41 GMT -5 swamp said:

So every teen who has their picture taking flipping the bird is a murderous thug?  

Did somebody say that?

[cereb]

May 1, 2013 18:17:41 GMT -5 swamp said:

So every teen who has their picture taking flipping the bird is a murderous thug?  

Only in Paul's world...

[swamp]

 It. Was implied in post 75 and also in the long running trayvon thread. 

[cereb]

"Coming from someone who tells people who dont agree with her to shut the fuck up and that they are a douche."


I never ever said that. Reading is fundamental.


Impulse control problem?

[cereb]

May 1, 2013 18:27:32 GMT -5 @steve said:

May 1, 2013 18:22:06 GMT -5 cereb said:

"Coming from someone who tells people who dont agree with her to shut the fuck up and that they are a douche."


I never ever said that. Reading is fundamental.


Impulse control problem?

cereb
Full Contributor



Joined: Mar 23, 2011
Posts: 3,373
Reply #8 posted Apr 19, 2013 at 5:09pm Sugilite likes this. Quote Post by cereb on Apr 19, 2013 at 5:09pm Apr 19, 2013 at 1:54pm chiver78 said:wow. thanks for your concern, really.

and if you intend to turn this thread into a "lesson" for us dumb people in MA, I'm here to tell you that it will result in your thread being locked. as I sit here and keep updated on the chaos going on in my city, I am so totally NOT in the mood for BS today. clear?

-chiver mod
Agreed. My city is a shit storm. So if you plan on being a douche about it, STFU.
   

I read  fine.

What you stated I said and what I actually said appear to be two different things. Now, I am done. I am asking you one time and one time only to back off. I don't appreciate you following my posts, nor am I appreciating the growing harassment from you over a comment which you can't seem to correctly interpret. I have tried to be light about it, but this is becoming disturbing and you need to stop or ignore me altogether. I am not interested in any further dialog with you on this subject.

[mmhmm]

Cereb and steve:  If you don't care for one another's posts, ignore them.  This two-way argument is not going to continue here.  Further back-and-forth will be deleted.

mmhmm, Administrator

*Thanks, cereb.  You and I were posting at the same time.  I appreciate your backing out of this battle and hope steve will do the same.

[TonyTiger]

May 1, 2013 18:20:26 GMT -5 swamp said:

 It. Was implied in post 75 and also in the long running trayvon thread. 

Hmmmmm... I dunno about #75... seems more about throwing monkey-poo at the Liberal Lamestream Media for trying to portray Martin as one notch removed from Rebecca of Sunnybrook Farms.

But I'll take your word for it that something similar was discussed in the main Saint Trayvon thread, pending input from Paul.

[cereb]

* Let's just leave it as is, please.  There need be no further communication between the two of you, or about either.  Thanks.

mmhmm, Administrator

[cereb]

May 1, 2013 18:37:22 GMT -5 TonyTiger said:

May 1, 2013 18:20:26 GMT -5 swamp said:

 It. Was implied in post 75 and also in the long running trayvon thread. 

Hmmmmm... I dunno about #75... seems more about throwing monkey-poo at the Liberal Lamestream Media for trying to portray Martin as one notch removed from Rebecca of Sunnybrook Farms.

But I'll take your word for it that something similar was discussed in the main Saint Trayvon thread, pending input from Paul.

How did we go from Rush to Treyvon Martin....